Verdict: 74% say CI was awesome or good!

All summer, GWBlogspot.com's had an online poll about people's experience at Colonial Inauguration.

Today, the verdict is in:

• 74% say their CI experience was awesome or good.
  
• 25% say awful or nothing special.

Interesting fact: Before this year's CI sessions began, and only upper-classmen were voting, the poll was split nearly evenly across all 4 options. After CI began, "awesome" and "good" gained steam.

So, what does that mean? Was this year's CI was much better than years past? Do people's fond memories of CI retroactively get dimmer? Are the upper-classmen who read this blog just cranky old curmudgeons? :) What do you think?