Having spent the entire month of February researching, brainstorming campaign issues, and prepping Lifton's opponent for the presidential debates, I know that the Gelman Library rennovation was never a major campaign issue. An alcohol amnesty policy was, campus safety was, reducing the rep tape at GW was, but the library wasn't. For that reason alone, I question why it would be his main initiative to this point.
Secondly, the details of how he plans to improve the library are pretty vague. The Hatchet article does mention the following:
Lifton said he plans to work with Ryan Last, founder of the Facebook fan pageHowever, the article also states that they already ship 20,000 books per year to the off site location. That's nothing new though, and it's not really an improvement that seems worth while.
"Get Gelman Going," which has gathered 1,163 fans, and the WRLC to explore the
possibility of relocating more books to an off-campus site to make room for more
study space.
Lastly, as the article also points out, the main issue with the library rennovation is the lack of funding for the project. It states that only $150,000 of the $5 million needed for the project had been raised in September. The issue is funding. In my opinion, it is not the job of the Student Association President to fundraise.
3 comments:
I really want to know if you're trying to look stupid. If you were supposed to research issues, how did you miss that Lifton mentioned increasing/improving study space on his platform and as one of his top three priorities in the hatchet?
From JASONLIFTON.COM: "As president I will continue to fight for support of our currently under funded libraries and work to further increase available study space on campus through programs such as Marvin Center Late Night and Study Zones."
And from the Hatchet profile on him: "Top three platform goals: Reform advising, Increase study space, Revise student organization financial process"
I didn't say that it wasn't something he brought up. I was implying that it wasn't the focus of the debates had more to do with alcohol amnesty and other more pressing issues.
Wow let's try that again...
***I didn't say that it wasn't something he brought up. I was implying that it wasn't the focus of the debates and that the debates had more to do with alcohol amnesty and more pressing issues.
Post a Comment