In it the ABC News states that they did
An initial review by ABC News of the 17,481 pages of Sen. Hillary Clinton's schedule as first lady, released today by the National ArchivesFirst I laughed literally out loud that they probably made some poor interns go through 17 THOUSAND pages and they happened to figure out that Hilary MAY have been in the White House when the "dirty deed" took place. I laughed even harder that ABC News feels this is something that matters.
Because honestly WHO CARES if she was in the near proximity of this act. What are they trying to do? Are they trying to humiliate her more by stating HAHA you were right there and didn't do anything?? Or are they trying to show that they take the time to go through all of these papers for some breaking news?
Either way it seems like a waste of time to me. Cool you did some investigative reporting, how about you do some of that in issues that actually matter!